Reincarnation: Difference between revisions
Wikiboteng (talk | contribs) Interlanguage link |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
In the works of Martinus, the Danish thinker and spiritual writer, love is not merely an emotion among others but the central principle of the universe and the ultimate aim of every living being's existence. Martinus describes love as the fully developed and harmonised expression of feeling energy in unity with intelligence energy, distinguishing it from forms of attachment grounded in physical attraction, possession, or self-preservation. In this framework, love is both the fundamental nature of the Godhead and the destiny of terrestrial mankind: the process by which the individual evolves from an animal mode of being centred on self-preservation to a spiritual mode of being centred on the unselfish bestowal of happiness on others. | |||
Central to Martinus' analysis are several interconnected terms: "neighbourly love," "universal love," "love principle," "love material," "love body," and "love wisdom." Each addresses a different aspect of the same overarching idea. As Martinus writes, "the whole of the individual's mentality should thus be love," framing love not as one capacity among many but as the complete orientation of a developed being toward its surroundings and toward life itself.{{ref|short book 10|2.17}} | |||
== | == Love as intellectualised feeling == | ||
Martinus | Martinus grounds his definition of love in the relationship between feeling and intelligence. In ''On My Cosmic Analyses'' he writes that where the balance between feeling and intelligence is perfect, "the mental display that we call 'love' arises. Love is thus intellectualised feeling."{{ref|short book 12|2.1}} Feeling that is not intellectualised, he explains, can in the best case produce "pampering" or "spoiling," and in the worst case the mental display called "hatred." Neither state allows one to perceive an object correctly, because both produce a one-sided view. | ||
In ''Experience of life'', Martinus describes the evolutionary moment at which this harmony is achieved: at the highest peak, the combination of intelligence energy and feeling energy "appears as pure love; in other words a manifestation is released which aims only at being for the benefit of other living beings without any consideration of the cost to the person concerned in terms of unpleasantness or suffering."{{ref|LB1|178}} He cautions that this love should not be confused with "married love" or "falling in love," which he regards as originating in the reproductive organs and the instinct of self-preservation. Genuine love, he continues, "does not seek its own" and does not expect gain or reward.{{ref|LB1|178}} | |||
A further passage describes beings who possess "love wisdom" as capable of perceiving other beings' lives, "their sorrow and joy, their suffering and unhappiness." At the culmination of this development, the resulting state is named "universal love."{{ref|LB1|232}} | |||
== | == Distinguishing genuine love from partial expressions == | ||
Martinus | A significant part of Martinus' analysis distinguishes universal love from partial forms under which love appears in terrestrial experience. In ''The highly developed researcher and the illusory appearance of "created things"'' he argues that the delight and admiration between beings of "opposite sexes" celebrated by poets and authors is a longing for possession rather than for the good of the other being.{{ref|LB4|1125}} | ||
"Maternal love," likewise, is described as "largely selfish" when it applies only to the mother's own child and functions as an extension of self-preservation. Martinus proposes that when a mother cares for other children just as much as her own, this is no longer merely maternal love but neighbourly love, which he calls "the fulfilment of the law."{{ref|LB4|1126}} | |||
In a detailed analysis of amorous love, Martinus identifies an initial sympathetic impulse followed by a demand for possession and reciprocated love.{{ref|LB5|1819}} He argues that unrequited love is an unsatisfied hunger rather than genuine love, since "love can never be unhappy" and "love never seeks its own."{{ref|LB5|1820}} He describes this possessive aspect as a destructive force in terrestrial life.{{ref|LB5|1821}} | |||
== Neighbourly love as the fulfilment of the law == | |||
The concept of "neighbourly love" occupies a central position in Martinus' writings. Drawing on the Biblical injunction to love one's neighbour as oneself, Martinus interprets this as the highest evolutionary aim of the terrestrial human being: to live so that one's highest happiness consists in being of advantage to one's neighbour.{{ref|short book 10|2.17}} He identifies love with the desire to give one's neighbour happiness and joy, and contrasts love of one's surroundings, which he equates with liberation, with hatred of one's surroundings, which he equates with mental imprisonment.{{ref|short book 10|2.19}} | |||
Martinus further argues that the terrestrial human being is reaching a critical evolutionary crossroads at which sympathy and love become directed not exclusively toward an opposite sex but toward all beings.{{ref|short book 13|1.30}} This new capacity transforms the being from a mental half-sun that casts shadows toward some beings into a mental solar being that sends its halo over everything and everyone.{{ref|short book 13|1.30}} | |||
== The evolutionary development of love == | |||
Because love is described as the product of harmony between feeling and intelligence, its development is gradual and evolutionary. Martinus writes that pain and suffering develop and ennoble the faculty of feeling; when feeling energy comes into harmony with intelligence energy, genuine love arises.{{ref|LB1|232}} As feeling is refined, mankind becomes less qualified as an animal and more qualified as a human being. He names this transformation the development of terrestrial mankind's science into the "science of love." | |||
The physical body that carries this function is what Martinus calls the "love body"—the body made of feeling or love energy, corresponding to the "real human kingdom."{{ref|LB1|181}} He writes that only by training to love can one's senses open up to God's radiance.{{ref|LB3|701}} | |||
== Love, humility, and the Godhead == | |||
Martinus | Martinus connects love closely with humility. "Love cannot exist without being the same as 'humility'," he writes, describing humility as the recognition of the perfection and imperfection of one's own being.{{ref|short book 12|1.33}} In the same passage he states that love is "the great and profound aim behind every terrestrial human quest." | ||
At the ultimate level, Martinus identifies love with the nature of the Godhead. In ''World redemption'' he describes love as "the Godhead's own inner radiating fire which pervades everything and everybody" and as "the inmost fundamental spirit and power of the universe itself."{{ref|short book 11|1.7}} He argues that this all-pervading love cannot be diminished by what any individual believes about it.{{ref|short book 11|1.7}} | |||
In ''The transformation of the Earth'', Martinus discusses the climactic love contact between perfected double-poled beings as a direct experience of the Godhead's presence.{{ref|TEWP 3|33.35}} | |||
In | In ''Mental sovereignty'', Martinus draws an analogy between the perfected human being and the sun: the being maintains its existence "exclusively by giving life, which in turn means radiating love to everything and everyone."{{ref|short book 10|2.20}} He further states that the world plan is the culmination of love.{{ref|short book 10|1.12}} | ||
== Love material and the kernel of the eternal panorama == | |||
In ''Experience of life'', Martinus describes a process by which all experience leaves copies in what he calls "love material," which he characterises as the spiritual world's most precious "metal" or "gold."{{ref|LB1|211}} These copies constitute the inner world of the individual, which he names the "kingdom of bliss," where past suffering is experienced in a transfigured light. | |||
The symbol of the heart, discussed in ''The Eternal Way of Development and Progress'', volume 2, is said to represent a being that has attained "a total or perfect ability to love," while the two joined hands within the heart signify a perfect ability to forgive.{{ref|TEWP 2|23.6}} | |||
== See also == | |||
Martinus | * [[Martinus]] | ||
* [[Livets Bog]] | |||
* [[The Eternal World Picture]] | |||
* [[The Road to Initiation]] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 05:09, 17 August 2026
Introduction
In the works of Martinus, the Danish thinker and spiritual writer, love is not merely an emotion among others but the central principle of the universe and the ultimate aim of every living being's existence. Martinus describes love as the fully developed and harmonised expression of feeling energy in unity with intelligence energy, distinguishing it from forms of attachment grounded in physical attraction, possession, or self-preservation. In this framework, love is both the fundamental nature of the Godhead and the destiny of terrestrial mankind: the process by which the individual evolves from an animal mode of being centred on self-preservation to a spiritual mode of being centred on the unselfish bestowal of happiness on others.
Central to Martinus' analysis are several interconnected terms: "neighbourly love," "universal love," "love principle," "love material," "love body," and "love wisdom." Each addresses a different aspect of the same overarching idea. As Martinus writes, "the whole of the individual's mentality should thus be love," framing love not as one capacity among many but as the complete orientation of a developed being toward its surroundings and toward life itself. [1]
Love as intellectualised feeling
Martinus grounds his definition of love in the relationship between feeling and intelligence. In On My Cosmic Analyses he writes that where the balance between feeling and intelligence is perfect, "the mental display that we call 'love' arises. Love is thus intellectualised feeling." [2] Feeling that is not intellectualised, he explains, can in the best case produce "pampering" or "spoiling," and in the worst case the mental display called "hatred." Neither state allows one to perceive an object correctly, because both produce a one-sided view.
In Experience of life, Martinus describes the evolutionary moment at which this harmony is achieved: at the highest peak, the combination of intelligence energy and feeling energy "appears as pure love; in other words a manifestation is released which aims only at being for the benefit of other living beings without any consideration of the cost to the person concerned in terms of unpleasantness or suffering." [3] He cautions that this love should not be confused with "married love" or "falling in love," which he regards as originating in the reproductive organs and the instinct of self-preservation. Genuine love, he continues, "does not seek its own" and does not expect gain or reward. [4]
A further passage describes beings who possess "love wisdom" as capable of perceiving other beings' lives, "their sorrow and joy, their suffering and unhappiness." At the culmination of this development, the resulting state is named "universal love." [5]
Distinguishing genuine love from partial expressions
A significant part of Martinus' analysis distinguishes universal love from partial forms under which love appears in terrestrial experience. In The highly developed researcher and the illusory appearance of "created things" he argues that the delight and admiration between beings of "opposite sexes" celebrated by poets and authors is a longing for possession rather than for the good of the other being. [6]
"Maternal love," likewise, is described as "largely selfish" when it applies only to the mother's own child and functions as an extension of self-preservation. Martinus proposes that when a mother cares for other children just as much as her own, this is no longer merely maternal love but neighbourly love, which he calls "the fulfilment of the law." [7]
In a detailed analysis of amorous love, Martinus identifies an initial sympathetic impulse followed by a demand for possession and reciprocated love. [8] He argues that unrequited love is an unsatisfied hunger rather than genuine love, since "love can never be unhappy" and "love never seeks its own." [9] He describes this possessive aspect as a destructive force in terrestrial life. [10]
Neighbourly love as the fulfilment of the law
The concept of "neighbourly love" occupies a central position in Martinus' writings. Drawing on the Biblical injunction to love one's neighbour as oneself, Martinus interprets this as the highest evolutionary aim of the terrestrial human being: to live so that one's highest happiness consists in being of advantage to one's neighbour. [11] He identifies love with the desire to give one's neighbour happiness and joy, and contrasts love of one's surroundings, which he equates with liberation, with hatred of one's surroundings, which he equates with mental imprisonment. [12]
Martinus further argues that the terrestrial human being is reaching a critical evolutionary crossroads at which sympathy and love become directed not exclusively toward an opposite sex but toward all beings. [13] This new capacity transforms the being from a mental half-sun that casts shadows toward some beings into a mental solar being that sends its halo over everything and everyone. [14]
The evolutionary development of love
Because love is described as the product of harmony between feeling and intelligence, its development is gradual and evolutionary. Martinus writes that pain and suffering develop and ennoble the faculty of feeling; when feeling energy comes into harmony with intelligence energy, genuine love arises. [15] As feeling is refined, mankind becomes less qualified as an animal and more qualified as a human being. He names this transformation the development of terrestrial mankind's science into the "science of love."
The physical body that carries this function is what Martinus calls the "love body"—the body made of feeling or love energy, corresponding to the "real human kingdom." [16] He writes that only by training to love can one's senses open up to God's radiance. [17]
Love, humility, and the Godhead
Martinus connects love closely with humility. "Love cannot exist without being the same as 'humility'," he writes, describing humility as the recognition of the perfection and imperfection of one's own being. [18] In the same passage he states that love is "the great and profound aim behind every terrestrial human quest."
At the ultimate level, Martinus identifies love with the nature of the Godhead. In World redemption he describes love as "the Godhead's own inner radiating fire which pervades everything and everybody" and as "the inmost fundamental spirit and power of the universe itself." [19] He argues that this all-pervading love cannot be diminished by what any individual believes about it. [20]
In The transformation of the Earth, Martinus discusses the climactic love contact between perfected double-poled beings as a direct experience of the Godhead's presence. [21]
In Mental sovereignty, Martinus draws an analogy between the perfected human being and the sun: the being maintains its existence "exclusively by giving life, which in turn means radiating love to everything and everyone." [22] He further states that the world plan is the culmination of love. [23]
Love material and the kernel of the eternal panorama
In Experience of life, Martinus describes a process by which all experience leaves copies in what he calls "love material," which he characterises as the spiritual world's most precious "metal" or "gold." [24] These copies constitute the inner world of the individual, which he names the "kingdom of bliss," where past suffering is experienced in a transfigured light.
The symbol of the heart, discussed in The Eternal Way of Development and Progress, volume 2, is said to represent a being that has attained "a total or perfect ability to love," while the two joined hands within the heart signify a perfect ability to forgive. [25]
See also
References
- ↑ Kosmisk bevidsthed, section 2.17 (*)
- ↑ Vejen til indvielse, section 2.1 (*)
- ↑ Livets Bog 1, section 178
- ↑ Livets Bog 1, section 178
- ↑ Livets Bog 1, section 232
- ↑ Livets Bog 4, section 1125
- ↑ Livets Bog 4, section 1126
- ↑ Livets Bog 5, section 1819
- ↑ Livets Bog 5, section 1820
- ↑ Livets Bog 5, section 1821
- ↑ Kosmisk bevidsthed, section 2.17 (*)
- ↑ Kosmisk bevidsthed, section 2.19 (*)
- ↑ Juleevangeliet, section 1.30 (*)
- ↑ Juleevangeliet, section 1.30 (*)
- ↑ Livets Bog 1, section 232
- ↑ Livets Bog 1, section 181
- ↑ Livets Bog 3, section 701
- ↑ Vejen til indvielse, section 1.33 (*)
- ↑ Bønnens mysterium, section 1.7 (*)
- ↑ Bønnens mysterium, section 1.7 (*)
- ↑ The Eternal World Picture 3, section 33.35
- ↑ Kosmisk bevidsthed, section 2.20 (*)
- ↑ Kosmisk bevidsthed, section 1.12 (*)
- ↑ Livets Bog 1, section 211
- ↑ The Eternal World Picture 2, section 23.6